Sabrina's Protection. Lucio Pozzi, 1993 |
In John Berger’s book, “Way of Seeing”, particularly in
Chapter 3, he argues that in western nude art and present day media, that women
are largely shown and treated as objects in which power is asserted by men
either as figures in the canvas or as observers. Berger’s purpose is to make readers
aware of how the perception of women in the art so that they will recognize the
evolution of western cultured art.
Berger
begins by claiming that in nude art the “presence” of a man is that of an actor
who asserts his power over women, who are presented as objects. By presence, I
believe Berger means how men are authorities over women in the paintings. An
example would be in Reclining Bacchante by Trutat (45), the woman in this painting is wanting to
appear pleasing to the artist and those that view her by laying in a way that
her naked body is clearly visible. While in the window, a male is awkwardly
looking in through the window at the woman’s private parts. These kinds of
actions of the man represent how men exerted power over women and make them
feel or looked upon as objects.
Walking
around the Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center, I can see how it was easy to find
paintings, sculptures, or photographs that could certainly favor Berger’s
argument about women, nudity, and control. The picture I chose to analyze was Sabrina’s
Protection by Lucio Pozzi. It’s a current abstract piece of art. It may not
fall right in line with the thought process of Berger with the more realistic
paintings but I think that it shows how art has progressed. I see strength in
the combination of nudity and abstraction. Berger says that in modern art the
category of the nude has become less important (63). This is true in Sabrina’s
Protection; if you take a close look at her face there is less of softness and
more of masculinity. Women will always be portrayed differently than their male
counterpart but not because the feminine is different from the masculine.
Berger believes it is because the “ideal” spectator is always assumed to be
male and the image of a woman is designed to flatter him (64). While Pozzi’s
painting walks a fine line in this argument due to its abstraction I don’t
believe that portrayals of nude women necessarily mean it was to appease a male
viewer.
Works Cited: Berger, John. Ways of Seeing. London: British Broadcasting Corporation, 1972. Print.
good but a wee bit more description of what you are seeing in the image
ReplyDelete